Variasi perilaku mencari makan pada semut rangrang Oecophylla smaragdina (Fabricius) pada habitat yang berbeda

Variations of foraging behavior of weaver ants Oecophylla smaragdina (Fabricius) in different habitats

Authors

  • Rezki Rezki Departemen Biologi, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, IPB University, Indonesia; Program Studi Biologi, Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi, Universitas Sipatokkong Mambo, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3119-1212
  • Nur Aoliya Departemen Biologi, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, IPB University, Indonesia
  • Fadliansyah Fadliansyah Departemen Biologi, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, IPB University, Indonesia
  • Siti Latifa Wulandari Departemen Biologi, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, IPB University, Indonesia; Program Studi Agronomi, Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi, Universitas Amal Ilmiah Yapis Wamena, Indonesia
  • David Reinhard Jesajas Departemen Biologi, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, IPB University, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8294-9612
  • Rika Raffiudin Departemen Biologi, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, IPB University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5994/jei.20.2.141

Keywords:

competition, non-urban, Oecophylla smaragdina, sequencial of foraging behavior, urban

Abstract

Weaver ants (Oecophylla smaragdina (Fabricus)) are carnivorous insects and play a role as biocontrol agents in urban habitats. This study aims to analyze the foraging behavior of O. smaragdina in two different habitats, namely urban and non-urban. The two locations are characterized by differences in the intensity of human interaction and the distance between the trees and the tree canopy. The behavioral observation method uses all sampling events with five behavioral categories: lurking (M1), approaching (M2), carrying (M3), communicating between ants in a colony (K1), and competition with other ants (K2). We tested three different types of feed: chick scraps, Tenebrio molitor Linnaeus larvae, and sugar. The results showed that there were three sequences of foraging behavior in urban areas, namely: (1) M1, M2, K1, M3, (2) M1, M2, K1, M3, K2, and (3) M1, M2, K2, M3. Meanwhile, there is only one pattern in non-urban areas, namely M1, M2, M3. Approaching food (M2) and lurking food (M1) were the dominant responses of O. smaragdina in urban and non-urban areas. In urban areas, broiler chickens were the type of feed most approached by ants, followed by sugar and beetle larvae. O. smaragdina in non-urban areas also preferred chicken pieces as feed compared to the others, but only one individual O. smaragdina approached (M2) chicken pieces and none approached the others. Foraging ants are more active at high temperature and low humidity, compared to low temperature and high humidity. Therefore, the foraging behavior of O. smaragdina is influenced by habitat factors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agosti D, Major DJ, Alonso LE, Schultz TR. 2000. Ants: Standard Methods for Measuring and Monitoring Biodiversity. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.

Cammaerts MC. 2013. Trail following learning by young Myrmica rubra workers (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). ISRN Entomology. 2013:1−6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/792891.

Cammaerts MC, Cammaerts R. 2016. Ants can expect the time of an event on basis of previous experiences. ISRN Entomology. 2016:1−9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9473128.

Dianing RL, Basuki E, Darsono. 2017. Kuantiasanakan kultur semut rangrang, Oecophylla smaragdina, sacara arti fisial dengan menggunakan beberapa jenis pakan yang berbeda. Scripta Biologica. 4:47−51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20884/1.sb.2017.4.1.385.

Devarajan, K. 2016. The antsy social network: Determinants of nest structure and arrangement in Asian weaver ants. Plos One. 11:e0156681. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156681.

Falahudin I. 2012. Peranan Semut Rangrang (Oecophylla smaragdina) dalam Pengendalian Biologis Pada Perkebunan Kelapa sawit. Palembang: Fakultas Tarbiyah IAIN Raden Fatah.

Hardiyanti, Yusminah H, Eka PT. 2015. Identifikasipola perilaku pada semut jepang dewasa. Bionature. 16:63−68.

Hirt MR, Lauermann T, Brose U, Noldus LPJJ, Dell AI. 2017. The little things that run: A general scaling of invertebrate exploratory speed with body mass. Ecology. 98:2751–2757. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2006.

Holldobler B. 1983. Territorial behavior in the green tree ant (Oecophylla smaragdina). Biotropica. 15:241−250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2387648.

Howard DF, Tschinkel WR. 1980. The effect of colony size and starvation on food flow in the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 7:293−300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300670.

Louise VO, Elise B, Raphaël B, Carlos B, Xim Cerdá. 2011. Temperature limits trail following behaviour through pheromone decay in ants. Nature Wissen Schaften. 98:1009−1017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-011-0852-6.

Maschwitz U, Hanel H. 1985. The migrating hersman Dolichoderus (diobolus) cuspidatus an ant with a novel mode of life. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 17:171−184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299249.

Offenberg J, Thu CNT, Decha W.2013. The effectivess of weaver ant Oecophylla smaragdina biocontrol in southestasean citrus and mango. Asian Myrmecology. 3:139−149.

Oudenhove. VL, Billoir E, Boulay R, Bernstein C, Cerdá X. 2011. Temperature limits trail following behavior through pheromone decay in ants. Naturwissenschaften. 98:1009–1017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-011-0852-6.

Pimid M, Ahmad AH, Krishnan KT, Scian J. 2019. Food preferences and foraging activity of asian weaver ants, Oecophylla smaragdina (Fabricius) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Tropical Life Sciences Research. 30:167–179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21315/tlsr2019.30.2.12.

Porter SD, Tschinkel WR. 1987. Foraging in Solenopsisinvicta (Hymenotpera: Formicidae): effects of waether and season. Environmental Entomology. 16:802−808. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/16.3.802.

Roper TJ. 1986. Cultural evolution of feeding behaviour in animals. Science Progress. 70:571−583.

Salle AJ. 1973. Fundamental Principles of Bacteriology 7th Ed. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

Syafriyandi. 2016. Semut rangrang (Oecophylla Smaragdina) dan benda-benda. berteknologi dalam fotografi ekspresi. Jurnal Rekam. 12:107−117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24821/rekam.v12i2.1427.

Sumarto S, Koneri R. 2016. Ekologi Hewan. Bandung: CV. Patra Media Grafindo.

Published

2023-08-24

How to Cite

Rezki, R., Aoliya, N., Fadliansyah, F., Wulandari, S. L., Jesajas, D. R., & Raffiudin, R. (2023). Variasi perilaku mencari makan pada semut rangrang Oecophylla smaragdina (Fabricius) pada habitat yang berbeda: Variations of foraging behavior of weaver ants Oecophylla smaragdina (Fabricius) in different habitats. Jurnal Entomologi Indonesia, 20(2), 141. https://doi.org/10.5994/jei.20.2.141

Issue

Section

Articles