Host preference of Araecerus fasciculatus (DeGeer) (Coleoptera: Anthribidae): Adult presence and oviposition on twelve maize varieties
Preferensi inang Araecerus fasciculatus (DeGeer) (Coleoptera: Anthribidae): Kehadiran imago dan oviposisi pada dua belas varietas jagung
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5994/jei.22.3.189Keywords:
adult presence, maize, oviposition preferenceAbstract
The coffee bean weevil, Araecerus fasciculatus (DeGeer) (Coleoptera: Anthribidae), is a significant polyphagous stored product pest known to cause severe damage, including perforation and hollowing, in stored maize. This study aimed to determine the adult presence and oviposition preference of A. fasciculatus across twelve commercial maize varieties, and to analyze the correlation between preference and specific grain characteristics. The free choice test method (FCTM) was employed using preference cages with 12 or 6 chambers. In each test, 30 g of maize were infested with 60 pairs of 7- to 14-day-old A. fasciculatus adults for seven days. Adult presence (total and by sex) was recorded daily, and the number of eggs laid was counted microscopically at the end of the infestation period. The composition of maize varieties significantly affected adult presence and oviposition. Results consistently showed that the Pertiwi 3 variety was the most highly preferred for both adult presence (21.86 individuals in the 12-variety test) and oviposition (22.75 eggs in the 12-variety test). This high preference was supported by the Perkasa variety (e.g., 13.54 adults), which was also consistently preferred across the different test compositions. Further analysis using the generalized linear model (GLM) indicated that the preference is driven by grain quality: adult presence showed a positive correlation with moisture content, while oviposition exhibited a negative correlation with phenol content. These findings suggest that the Pertiwi 3 variety, likely due to its favorable physical attributes and low levels of chemical defense, is the most susceptible to A. fasciculatus infestation.
Downloads
INTRODUCTION
Maize (Zea mays L.) is globally one of the most vital cereal crops (Shah et al., 2016). In Indonesia, its utility is diverse, serving as a primary food source (Sulaiman et al., 2018), industrial raw material, cattle feed, and a component of the bioindustry (Sulaiman et al., 2018); (Fiqriansyah et al., 2021). In addition, maize is also high in carbohydrates and contains various nutrients, so it is considered a potential rice substitute (Nadhifa et al., 2025). The extensive utilization of this crop has spurred the development of numerous varieties, leading to significant increases in production yields. Indonesia’s production grew by 0.43 million tons between 2023 and 2024 (Statistik, 2024), utilizing popular varieties such as Bisi 2, BTS 5, Bisma, Lamuru, Perkasa, Pertiwi 3, and others. As production volumes rise, effective post-harvest management is crucial to maintain the quality and quantity of stored maize.
A major threat to stored maize quality is infestation by the coffee bean weevil, Araecerus fasciculatus (DeGeer) (Hill, 2002); (Hagstrum et al., 2013). This insect is highly polyphagous (Kumar & Ray, 2022) and cosmopolitan (Alba-Alejandre et al., 2018), distributed widely in tropical and subtropical regions. Araecerus fasciculatus is known to damage a broad array of stored commodities, including coffee, cassava, peanuts, dried and fresh fruits, and various medicinal materials. The damage inflicted by this pest is severe, resulting in perforations and hollowing of the diet (Rees, 2004). For instance, previous studies have documented yield reductions of up to 39.87% in coffee beans and 91.51% in dried cassava due to A. fasciculatus attack (Solomon, 2002); (Wahyuni et al., 2022).
The extent of damage caused by stored product pests is intrinsically linked to the inherent physical and chemical properties of the stored material. These properties vary among maize varieties and can profoundly influence insect behavior, particularly their host preference. Differences in grain characteristics affect insect activities such as adult aggregation, feeding, and oviposition site selection. However, limited information is currently available regarding the specific preferences of A. fasciculatus for various maize varieties concerning their physical and chemical profiles. Gaining this insight is critical for identifying vulnerable varieties and developing targeted management strategies. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the adult presence and oviposition preference of A. fasciculatus among twelve maize varieties using the free choice test method (FCTM), and to analyze the correlation between maize grain characteristics (specifically moisture and phenol content) and these preference indices.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study sites and experimental design
This research was conducted from November 2024 to April 2025 at the Plant Pest Laboratory, Department of Plant Pests and Diseases, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Brawijaya (UB). The experimental design was used a completely randomized design (CRD) with twelve treatments (maize varieties) and four replication. The maize varieties tested were: Bisi 2, BTS 5, Bisma, Lamuru, Perkasa, Nusa 01, Nusa 03, Pertiwi 3, Sukmaraga, Bima 20 URI, Bima 14 Batara, and Srikandi Kuning.
Insect rearing and diet preparation
Insect rearing. The coffee bean weevil, A. fasciculatus, specimens were obtained from the established insect collection at the Plant Pest Laboratory, UB. The insects were reared using a modified method based on (Novo & Baptista, 1998) and (Atikah et al., 2022). Five hundred grams (500 g) of dried cassava were placed into a rearing box (16 cm × 16 cm × 10 cm). Two hundred (200) unsexed A. fasciculatus adults were introduced into the box for seven days for oviposition. After this period, the adults were removed, and the infested diet was maintained in the box until the F1 progeny emerged. The adult A. fasciculatus used for the preference test were aged 1–2 weeks old (Novo & Baptista, 1998).
Diet sterilization. All diets used in the study, dried cassava for rearing and the twelve maize varieties for the treatments, were heat-sterilized to prevent contamination (Pratiwi & Ananda, 2020). The diets were placed in trays (29 cm × 21 cm × 4.5 cm) and heated in an oven at 40 °C for four hours. After sterilization, the diets were removed and allowed to cool at room temperature for at least 24 hours prior to use in the experiment.
Maize grain analysis. To characterize the experimental diets, both physical and chemical analyses were conducted on twelve maize varieties. Physical characterization, specifically grain hardness, was measured at the Laboratory of Agricultural Food Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Universitas Gadjah Mada (UGM), Yogyakarta. Chemical profiling included the determination of total phenolic content and proximate composition. The phenolic analysis was performed at the Plant Pest Laboratory, Department of Plant Pests and Diseases, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, while proximate analysis was carried out at the Chemistry Laboratory, Balai Pengujian dan Sertifikasi Mutu Barang (BPSMB), Malang, to determine moisture, ash, crude protein, lipid, and carbohydrate contents.
The results demonstrate that these maize varieties possess distinct physical and chemical profiles (Table 1). Grain hardness varied substantially, ranging from 379.95 N to 866.10 N. Regarding chemical composition, phenol contents fluctuated between 6.09 ppm and 9.46 ppm, and protein levels ranged from 4.59% to 8.02%. Furthermore, carbohydrate levels remained consistently high across all varieties (73.94%–79.82%), indicating that the selected varieties differ markedly in both their structural integrity and specific nutrient concentrations.
Preference test using the free choice test method
The host preference of A. fasciculatus was evaluated using the free choice test method (FCTM) within custom-made, transparent glass preference cages (± 3 mm thick) equipped with internal glass partitions to create separate chambers. The study employed two types of cages: one with twelve chambers (Figure 1A) and two separate units with six chambers each (Figure 1B). The experiments using the twelve-chamber and six-chamber configurations were conducted to verify the consistency of adult presence across different variety compositions. The twelve maize varieties were randomly assigned to these three test compositions: a single 12-variety test (all twelve varieties tested simultaneously), a first six-variety test (comprising Bisi 2, Bisma, Perkasa, Nusa 01, Sukmaraga, and Bima 20 URI), and a second six-variety test (comprising BTS 5, Lamuru, Nusa 03, Pertiwi 3, Bima 14 Batara, and Srikandi Kuning).
For each test, thirty grams (30 g) of the respective maize variety were placed into each chamber of the preference cage (Chijindu & Boateng, 2008). Infestation was initiated by introducing sixty pairs (120 individuals) of 7- to 14-day-old A. fasciculatus adults into the center of the cage (Chijindu, 2002). The cages were then sealed with a modified lid and covered with cloth. The number of adults present in each variety chamber was recorded daily for a total of seven days. The final count at 7 days after infestation (DAI) was recorded both as the total number of individuals and as a percentage to analyze trends across the different test compositions. On the seventh day, the adults were removed, and a final count was conducted, distinguishing between males and females for sex ratio determination. Following adult removal, the maize seeds were immediately inspected under a microscope to determine the number of eggs laid in each maize variety, thereby assessing the oviposition preference.
| Maize varieties | Hardness (N) | Phenol (ppm) | Protein (%) | Lipid (%) | Moisture (%) | Ash (%) | Carbohydrate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bisi 2 | 551.06 | 9.46 | 6.72 | 4.47 | 13.53 | 1.34 | 73.94 |
| BTS 5 | 560.55 | 7.89 | 6.48 | 4.45 | 8.27 | 1.33 | 79.46 |
| Bisma | 797.29 | 9.44 | 6.56 | 5.15 | 7.87 | 1.69 | 78.72 |
| Lamuru | 586.20 | 9.46 | 6.59 | 4.13 | 7.94 | 1.53 | 79.82 |
| Perkasa | 379.95 | 9.45 | 6.41 | 4.42 | 11.92 | 1.13 | 76.12 |
| Nusa 01 | 440.48 | 6.56 | 6.72 | 4.16 | 9.46 | 1.59 | 78.06 |
| Nusa 03 | 866.10 | 8.76 | 5.90 | 4.38 | 10.17 | 1.45 | 78.10 |
| Pertiwi 3 | 670.72 | 6.09 | 4.59 | 4.03 | 12.59 | 1.22 | 77.57 |
| Sukmaraga | 467.31 | 7.94 | 6.78 | 3.84 | 8.88 | 1.41 | 79.09 |
| Bima 20 URI | 640.73 | 8.77 | 5.87 | 4.25 | 8.99 | 1.46 | 79.44 |
| Bima 14 Batara | 400.33 | 8.82 | 7.88 | 3.40 | 10.43 | 1.40 | 76.90 |
| Srikandi Kuning | 859.40 | 9.01 | 8.02 | 4.05 | 8.81 | 1.49 | 77.63 |
Figure 1.Preference cage. A: 12 chambers and B: 6 chambers.
Data analysis
All data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) at a 5% significance level. If the ANOVA indicated a significant difference between treatments, further analysis was conducted using Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT) at a 5% error level. A generalized linear model (GLM) was employed to examine the relationship between the physical and chemical characteristics of the maize (e.g., moisture and phenol content) and the preference indices (adult presence and oviposition). All analyses were performed using R Statistics software, version 4.3.2 (Team, 2023). The index of dispersion (ID) was used to determine the distribution pattern of the A. fasciculatus adults within the preference test chambers (Arbab & Bakry, 2016). The formula used for the ID calculation is:
\documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle ID = \frac{S^2}{\bar{x}} \end{document}
where S2 is the sample variance and x̄ is the mean of the population. The distribution patterns are categorized as: uniform (ID < 1), random (ID = 1) and clumped (ID > 1).
RESULTS
Adult presence and preference of A. fasciculatus
Total adult presence. The composition of maize varieties significantly influenced the total presence of A. fasciculatus adults across all preference tests conducted over the seven-day infestation period (12-variety test: F = 8.93, P < 0.001; first six varieties: F = 33.88, P < 0.001; second six varieties: F = 134.60, P < 0.001). In the 12-variety preference test, the Pertiwi 3 variety (21.86 individuals) was the most preferred by A. fasciculatus adults, followed by Bisi 2 (14.22 individuals) and Perkasa (13.54 individuals) (Table 2). When tested in combinations of six, the adults showed an even stronger preference for certain varieties. In the first six-variety test, adults preferred Perkasa (30.29 individuals) and Pertiwi 3 (49.79 individuals) significantly more than the other four varieties (Table 3 and Table 4). These combined results demonstrate that A. fasciculatus adults consistently favored Pertiwi 3 and Perkasa when presented with different combinations of maize varieties. The distribution pattern of the adults across the chambers was determined to be clumped in all three preference tests, as indicated by the index of dispersion (ID) values (12 varieties: ID = 2.47; first six varieties: ID = 2.12; second six varieties: ID = 9.62). Furthermore, a generalized linear model (GLM) analysis revealed a positive correlation between the moisture content of the maize and the total adult presence (Estimate = 1.475; P = 0.001) (Table 5).
Presence by sex and sex ratio. An analysis of variance confirmed that the maize variety composition significantly affected the presence of both males and females at 7 DAI across all tests. In the 12-variety test, both male and female A. fasciculatus preferred the Pertiwi 3 variety (males: 10.75 individuals; females: 10.50 individuals), followed by the Perkasa variety (males: 6.00 individuals; females: 7.25 individuals) (Table 2). Similarly, in the first six-variety test, both sexes showed a higher preference for Perkasa (males: 14.50; females: 13.75 individuals) and Pertiwi 3 (males: 24.00; females: 25.50 individuals) over the other varieties (Table 3 and Table 4). Regarding distribution, the index of dispersion showed a clumped distribution pattern for both males and females in the 12-variety and second six-variety tests. The only exception was the females in the first six-variety test, which showed a uniform distribution pattern (ID = 0.75). GLM analysis further revealed a positive correlation between moisture content and the presence of both males (Estimate = 0.577; P = 0.012) and females (Estimate = 0.507; P = 0.039) (Table 5).
The sex ratio of A. fasciculatus adults varied across the preference tests. In the preference test of the twelve varieties of maize, the sex ratio of A. fasciculatus ranged from 1:0.60 to 1:1.36 (Table 2). The preference test on the first six varieties of maize showed that the sex ratio of A. fasciculatus ranged from 1:0.95 to 1:1.31 (Table 3). In the preference test of the second six varieties of maize, the sex ratio ranged from 1:0.63 to 1:1.06 (Table 4).
Oviposition preference of A. fasciculatus
The effect of maize variety composition on the number of eggs laid was significant in the 12-variety test (F = 7.98, P < 0.001) but not significant in the first sixvariety test (F = 1.03, P < 0.001). However, the effect was significant again in the second six-variety test (F = 15.06, P < 0.001). Consistent with the adult presence results, the Pertiwi 3 variety received the highest number of eggs in both the 12-variety test (22.75 eggs) and the second six-variety test (45.00 eggs) (Table 2 and Table 4). These findings confirm that females consistently chose Pertiwi 3 as the preferred variety for egg-laying across the tests where significant differences were detected. The distribution of eggs was clumped in the first six-variety test (ID = 2.66) and the second six-variety test (ID = 17.37). However, the 12-variety test showed a uniform distribution pattern for oviposition. Finally, GLM analysis identified a negative correlation between the phenol content of the maize grain and the number of eggs laid (Estimate = -2.908; P = 0.048) (Table 5).
| Maize varieties | Adult presence during 7 DAI | Adult presence at 7 DAI | Sex ratio (M:F) | Number of egg (Eggs) (x̄ ± SD) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Individuals (x̄ ± SD) |
% (x̄ ± SD) |
Male(Indiciduals) (x̄ ± SD) |
Female(Individuals) (x̄ ± SD) |
|||
| Bisi 2 | 14.22 ± 2.83 h | 11.85 ± 2.36 b | 6.75 ± 0.96 ab | 6.00 ± 1.41 bc | 1:0.89 | 7.25 ± 2.06 b |
| Bisma | 9.00 ± 1.29 cd | 7.50 ± 1.08 cd | 4.25 ± 0.96 bcd | 4.75 ± 1.50 bcd | 1:1.12 | 8.00 ± 4.83 b |
| Perkasa | 13.54 ± 4.54 bc | 11.28 ± 3.78 bc | 6.00 ± 1.83 abc | 7.25 ± 3.50 ab | 1:1.21 | 10.25 ± 4.57 b |
| Nusa 01 | 8.11 ± 1.04 de | 6.76 ± 0.87 de | 4.00 ± 1.15 bcd | 5.00 ± 1.41 bcd | 1:1.25 | 6.00 ± 4.08 bc |
| Sukmaraga | 8.25 ± 2.06 de | 6.88 ± 1.71 de | 4.50 ± 0.58 bcd | 4.50 ± 2.52 bcd | 1:1.00 | 5.00 ± 2.16 bc |
| Bima 20 URI | 7.64 ± 2.37 de | 6.37 ± 1.97 de | 2.75 ± 1.71 d | 3.75 ± 1.26 cde | 1:1.36 | 5.25 ± 1.50 bc |
| BTS 5 | 7.22 ± 1.13 de | 6.01 ± 0.94 de | 4.50 ± 1.29 bcd | 3.50 ± 0.58 cde | 1:0.78 | 2.75 ± 1.26 cd |
| Lamuru | 7.61 ± 1.26 de | 6.34 ± 1.05 de | 4.00 ± 0.82 bcd | 5.00 ± 0.82 bcd | 1:1.25 | 7.25 ± 2.63 b |
| Nusa 03 | 5.89 ± 1.74 e | 4.91 ± 1.45 e | 3.75 ± 2.22 cd | 2.25 ± 0.96 e | 1:0.60 | 1.50 ± 0.58 d |
| Pertiwi 3 | 21.86 ± 5.99 a | 18.22 ± 4.99 a | 10.75 ± 3.59 a | 10.50 ± 2.52 a | 1:0.98 | 22.75 ± 11.00 a |
| Bima 14 Batara | 9.50 ± 2.53 cd | 7.92 ± 2.11 cd | 4.25 ± 1.71 bcd | 4.50 ± 1.91 bcd | 1:1.06 | 5.50 ± 1.73 bc |
| Srikandi Kuning | 7.22 ± 1.08 de | 6.02 ± 0.90 de | 4.50 ± 1.29 bcd | 3.00 ± 1.41 de | 1:0.67 | 3.00 ± 3.37 d |
| Maize varieties | Adult presence during 7 DAI | Adult presence at 7 DAI |
Sex ratio (M:F) |
Number of egg (Eggs) (x̄ ± SD) |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Individuals (x̄ ± SD) |
% (x̄ ± SD) |
Male (Individuals) (x̄ ± SD) |
Female (Individuals) (x̄ ± SD) | |||
| Bisi 2 | 22.61 ± 2.28 b | 18.84 ± 1.90 b | 10.50 ± 1.29 bc | 11.00 ± 2.16 abc | 1:1.05 | 14.75 ± 10.47 a |
| Bisma | 14.22 ± 3.13 c | 11.84 ± 2.60 c | 6.50 ± 1.73 d | 8.50 ± 1.29 bc | 1:1.31 | 12.25 ± 2.99 a |
| Perkasa | 30.29 ± 1.20 a | 25.24 ± 1.00 a | 14.50 ± 2.38 a | 13.75 ± 2.36 a | 1:0.95 | 18.75 ± 7.46 a |
| Nusa 01 | 15.07 ± 2.26 c | 12.56 ± 1.88 c | 7.75 ± 1.71 cd | 9.75 ± 2.36 bc | 1:1.26 | 10.50 ± 5.20 a |
| Sukmaraga | 14.04 ± 2.53 c | 11.70 ± 2.11 c | 7.25 ± 1.71 d | 7.75 ± 2.62 c | 1:1.07 | 12.75 ± 4.03 a |
| Bima 20 URI | 23.79 ± 1.81 b | 19.82 ± 1.51 b | 11.25 ± 2.50 b | 11.50 ± 1.91 ab | 1:1.02 | 16.00 ± 3.56 a |
| Maize varieties | Adult presence durng 7 DAI | Sex (M:F) | Number of egg (Eggs) (x̄ ± SD) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Individuals (x̄ ± SD) |
% (x̄ ± SD) |
Male (Individuals) (x̄ ± SD) | Female (Individuals) (x̄ ± SD) | |||
| BTS 5 | 13.29 ± 0.35 c | 11.08 ± 0.29 c | 7.25 ± 2.06 b | 7.00 ± 0.82 b | 1:0.97 | 7.50 ± 2.08 bc |
| Lamuru | 16.29 ± 1.42 b | 13.57 ± 1.19 b | 8.25 ± 3.30 b | 8.25 ± 1.26 b | 1:1.00 | 11.00 ± 3.74 b |
| Nusa 03 | 11.96 ± 1.03 cd | 9.97 ± 0.85 cd | 6.75 ± 2.06 b | 5.00 ± 0.82 cd | 1:0.74 | 4.00 ± 2.16 c |
| Pertiwi 3 | 49.79 ± 2.37 a | 41.49 ± 1.97 a | 24.00 ± 1.83 a | 25.50 ± 3.11 a | 1:1.06 | 45.00 ± 14.85 a |
| Bima 14 Batara | 17.43 ± 2.68 b | 14.52 ± 2.24 b | 10.25 ± 2.50 b | 6.75 ± 2.06 bc | 1:0.66 | 13.00 ± 7.16 b |
| Srikandi Kuning | 11.25 ± 1.07 d | 9.38 ± 0.89 d | 6.75 ± 1.26 b | 4.25 ± 0.97 d | 1:0.63 | 5.00 ± 3.37 c |
| Variable | Adult presence during 7 DAI (Est) | Adult presence at 7 DAI | Number of eggs (Est) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male presence (Est) | Female presence (Est) | |||||||||||
| Est | SE | P | Est | SE | P | Est | SE | P | Est | SE | P | |
| (Intercept) | 10.698 | 11.896 | 0.374 | 7.509 | 6.562 | 0.259 | 9.165 | 7.147 | 0.207 | 25.118 | 18.443 | 0.181 |
| Phenol | -0.821 | 0.638 | 0.205 | -0.725 | 0.352 | 0.046* | -0.362 | 0.383 | 0.350 | -0.887 | 0.989 | 0.375 |
| Hardness | -0.001 | 0.004 | 0.972 | 0.003 | 0.002 | 0.232 | -0.003 | 0.002 | 0.166 | -0.002 | 0.006 | 0.767 |
| Protein | -1.024 | 0.922 | 0.273 | -0.045 | 0.509 | 0.929 | -0.822 | 0.554 | 0.146 | -2.908 | 1.429 | 0.048* |
| Lipid | 0.748 | 1.734 | 0.669 | 0.594 | 0.957 | 0.538 | 0.426 | 1.042 | 0.685 | -0.532 | 2.689 | 0.844 |
| Ash | -3.327 | 5.551 | 0.552 | -4.097 | 3.062 | 0.188 | -0.439 | 3.335 | 0.896 | 0.892 | 8.606 | 0.918 |
| Moisture | 1.475 | 0.397 | 0.001*** | 0.577 | 0.219 | 0.012* | 0.507 | 0.238 | 0.039* | 1.060 | 0.615 | 0.093 |
DISCUSSIONS
The preference of an insect for a specific host is fundamentally indicated by its consistent feeding and oviposition activities (Schoonhoven et al., 2005). In this study, the implementation of 12-variety and two 6-variety preference tests served to assess the consistency of host selection by A. fasciculatus adults across varying choices. The results strongly demonstrated that A. fasciculatus consistently preferred the Pertiwi 3 variety, and to a lesser extent, Perkasa, regardless of the other varieties present in the preference cage. This consistent choice suggests that the preference behavior of A. fasciculatus is driven by specific, inherent characteristics of the preferred maize varieties, which can be categorized into physical and chemical dietary factors (Manueke & Pelealu, 2015). The consistently clumped distribution pattern observed for adults in most tests further affirms that the insects actively aggregated toward the preferred varieties rather than dispersing randomly.
The physical characteristics of the maize grain appear to play a critical role in facilitating infestation and oviposition. Pertiwi 3 is hypothesized to possess a kernel type with a softer endosperm, which increases its susceptibility to post-harvest pests compared to other varieties (Suleiman et al., 2015). Softer kernels mechanically ease the process of feeding and, critically, allow females to penetrate the seed coat with their ovipositors for egg deposition. This mechanism is consistent with reports showing that A. fasciculatus females more readily lay eggs in softer substrates, such as the dried cassava tips (Salbiah & Sudrajat, 2022), mindi fruit pulp (Kumar & Ray, 2022), and softer parts of the coffee bean (Alba-Alejandre et al., 2018). Conversely, maize varieties with higher kernel hardness can act as a mechanical resistance, significantly reducing both feeding and colonization activities (Ngom et al., 2020).
Beyond physical attributes, the chemical characteristics of the maize varieties significantly influenced the adult presence and reproductive behavior of A. fasciculatus. Our generalized linear model (GLM) analysis established a positive correlation between the moisture content of the maize and the number of adults present. This aligns with prior findings that elevated moisture levels enhance the suitability of the diet, potentially increasing feeding activity, survivorship, and overall pest population growth in infested diets (Astuti, 2019). Studies have specifically highlighted that A. fasciculatus tends to prefer hosts with higher moisture content, such as peanuts (Hasby, 2023).
Furthermore, the oviposition preference was distinctly modulated by the host’s defensive chemistry. The GLM analysis revealed a negative correlation between the phenol content and the number of eggs laid. Phenol compounds function as a natural plant defense mechanism against phytophagous insects (Schowalter, 2011). The females of A. fasciculatus preferentially chose to lay eggs in varieties with lower phenol levels, such as Pertiwi 3 (which possesses low phenol and protein content, seeTable 5), thereby minimizing chemical toxicity exposure for their developing offspring. This behavior is a crucial adaptive strategy, ensuring that progeny develop successfully on an ideal diet (Arotolu et al., 2018); (Hasby, 2023). Although the sex ratio of the adults varied across tests, the consistent findings regarding both adult aggregation and egg-laying on the Pertiwi 3 variety ultimately confirm that its combination of favorable physical properties (soft kernel) and low levels of chemical defenses (low phenol) makes it highly susceptible to A. fasciculatus infestation.
CONCLUSIONS
The free choice test method (FCTM) successfully determined the host preference of A. fasciculatus among the twelve maize varieties tested. The results consistently demonstrated that the Pertiwi 3 variety was the most preferred by A. fasciculatus adults for both presence (infestation) and oviposition across the various test compositions. This strong preference is highly correlated with specific maize grain characteristics. Generalized linear model (GLM) analysis revealed that the adult presence of A. fasciculatus had a positive correlation with moisture content of the maize, while oviposition showed a negative correlation with phenol content. Consequently, the high preference for the Pertiwi 3 variety is attributable to its combination of favorable physical traits (hypothesized soft kernel) and low levels of chemical defenses (low phenol content), making it highly susceptible to infestation by A. fasciculatus.
References
- Alba-Alejandre I., Alba-Tercedor J., Vega F.E.. Micro-CT to document the coffee bean weevil, Araecerus fasciculatus (Coleoptera: Anthribidae), inside field-collected coffee cerries (Coffea canephora. Insects. 2018; 9:1-9. DOI
- Arbab A., Bakry M.M.S.. Spatial distribution and minimum sample size for monitoring of parlatoria date scale insect, Parlatoria blanchardi (Targioni-Tozzetti) (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) on date palm trees. Agriculture Research & Technology: Open Access Journal. 2016; 2:79-90.
- Arotolu T.E., Adeyemi J.A., Adedire C.O.. Influence of intrinsic factors of cowpea seed varieties on the cowpea weevil, Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae. Journal of Crop Protection. 2018; 7:219-229.
- Astuti L.P.. UB Press: Malang; 2019.
- Atikah P.D., Harahap I.S., Sartiami D.. potensi minyak atsiri daun jeruk purut sebagai fumigan nabati terhadap Araecerus fasciculatus (De Geer) (Coleoptera: Anthribidae) pada biji kakao di tempat penyimpanan. Jurnal Entomologi Indonesia. 2022; 19:77-83. DOI
- Statistik B.P.S.] Badan Pusat. Luas panen, produksi, dan produktivitas jagung menurut provinsi 2023-2024. 2024. Publisher Full Text
- Bhattacharya B., Banerjee T.C.. Factors affecting egg-laying behavior and fecundity of Callosobruchus chinensis (L.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) infesting stored pulses. Oriental Insects. 2001; 35:373-386. DOI
- Chijindu E.N.. Effect of Variety and Processed Forms of Cassava Chips on the Development of Prostephanus truncatus (Horn. 2002.
- Chijindu E.N., Boateng B.A.. Preference of and damage to processed cassava chips by Araecerus fasciculatus (Degeer. Journal of Applied Sciences Research. 2008; 4:939-944.
- Fiqriansyah M., Putri S.A., Syam R., Rahmadani A.S., Frianie T.N., Anugrah S., Sari Y.I., Adhayani A.N., Nurdiana Fauzan, Bachok N.A., Manggabarani A.M., Utami Y.D.. 2021.
- Hagstrum D.W., Klejdysz T., Subramanyam B., Nawrot J.. Atlas of Stored-Product Insects and Mites. 2013. DOI
- Hasby. Universitas Brawijaya: Malang; 2023.
- Hill D.S.. Springer Science and Business Media: London; 2002.
- Kumar A., Ray A.. biological and infestation studies on Araecerus fasciculatus DeGeer a new pest of Melia azadirach L. in India. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science. 2022; 42:1245-1254. DOI
- Manueke J., Pelealu J.. Ketertarikan hama Sitophilus oryzae pada beras, jagung pipilan, kacang tanah, kacang kedelai, dan kopra. Fakultas Pertanian Unsrat Manado. 2015; 21:70-79. DOI
- Nadhifa D.G., Mahendradatta M., Poespitasari A., Bastian F., Adhnitasari A.Y.. Characterization of analog rice produced from various carbohydrate sources and their functional components: A review. Discover Food. 2025; 5:1-30. DOI
- Ngom D., Fauconnier M.L., Malumba P., Dia C.A.K., Thiaw C., Sembène M.. Varietal susceptibility of maize to larger grain borer, Prostephanus truncatus (Horn. Journal Plos One. 2020; 15:1-16. DOI
- Novo J.P.S., Baptista E.G.C.. Rresposta olfativa do caruncho-do café Araecerus fasciculatus (Deg.) (Coleoptera: Anthribidae) a feromônios. Annals of the Entomological Society of Brasil. 1998; 27:337-343. DOI
- Pratiwi N.P.E., Ananda K.D.. Pengaruh beberapa tingkatan suhu ruang terhadap waktu perkembangan Cryptolestes ferrugineus Stephens. BIOEDUKASI: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi. 2020; 13:74-78. DOI
- Team R.Core. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. 2023. Publisher Full Text
- Rees D.. Insects of Stored Products. 2004. DOI
- Salbiah Hidayat Y., Sudrajat. Araecerus fasciculatus (De Geer) (Coleoptera: Anthribidae): Biologi dan kerusakannya pada singkong kering (Manihot esculenta Crantz. Jurnal Agrikultura. 2022; 33:225-235. DOI
- Schoonhoven L.M., Loon J.J.A., Dicke M.. Insect-Plant Biology. 2005. DOI
- Schowalter T.D.. Academic Press: UK; 2011.
- Shah T.R., Prasad K., Kumar P.. Maize - a potential source of human nutrition and health: A review. Cogent Food & Agriculture. 2016; 2:1-9. DOI
- Solomon D.. Studies on Damage by Prostephanus truncatus (Horn. 2002.
- Sulaiman A.A., Kariyasa I.K., Hoerudin Subagyono, K Bahar, F.A.. IAARD Press: Jakarta; 2018.
- Suleiman R., Rosentrater K.A., Bern C.J.. Evaluation of maize weevils Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky infestation on seven varieties of maize. Journal of Stored Products Research. 2015; 64:97-102. DOI
- Wahyuni T., Meilin A., Nasamsir. Pengaruh kadar air biji kopi liberika tungkal komposit (Coffea liberica L.) dalam penyimpanan terhadap serangan Araecerus fasciculatus (DeGeer. Jurnal Media Pertanian. 2022; 7:116-122. DOI
References
Alba-Alejandre I, Alba-Tercedor J, Vega FE. 2018. Micro-CT to document the coffee bean weevil, Araecerus fasciculatus (Coleoptera: Anthribidae), inside field-collected coffee cerries (Coffea canephora). Insects. 9:1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/insects9030100.
Arbab A, Bakry MMS. 2016. Spatial distribution and minimum sample size for monitoring of parlatoria date scale insect, Parlatoria blanchardi (Targioni-Tozzetti) (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) on date palm trees. Agriculture Research & Technology: Open Access Journal. 2:79–90.
Arotolu TE, Adeyemi JA, Adedire CO. 2018. Influence of intrinsic factors of cowpea seed varieties on the cowpea weevil, Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Journal of Crop Protection. 7:219–229.
Astuti LP. 2019. Strategi Pengelolaan Hama Pascapanen. Malang: UB Press.
Atikah PD, Harahap IS, Sartiami D. 2022. potensi minyak atsiri daun jeruk purut sebagai fumigan nabati terhadap Araecerus fasciculatus (De Geer) (Coleoptera: Anthribidae) pada biji kakao di tempat penyimpanan. Jurnal Entomologi Indonesia. 19:77–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5994/jei.19.1.77.
[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik. 2024. Luas panen, produksi, dan produktivitas jagung menurut provinsi 2023-2024. Available at: https://www.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/2/MjIwNCMy/luas-panen--produksi--dan-produktivitas-jagung-menurut-provinsi.html [accessed 6 Desember 2024].
Bhattacharya B, Banerjee TC. 2001. Factors affecting egg-laying behavior and fecundity of Callosobruchus chinensis (L.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) infesting stored pulses. Oriental Insects. 35:373–386. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00305316.2001.10417313.
Chijindu EN. 2002. Effect of Variety and Processed Forms of Cassava Chips on the Development of Prostephanus truncatus (Horn) (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) and Araecerus fasciculatus (DeGeer) (Coleoptera: Anthribidae). Magister Thesis. Nigeria: Nnamdi Azikiwe University.
Chijindu EN, Boateng BA. 2008. Preference of and damage to processed cassava chips by Araecerus fasciculatus (Degeer). Journal of Applied Sciences Research. 4:939–944.
Fiqriansyah M, Putri SA, Syam R, Rahmadani AS, Frianie TN, Anugrah S, Sari YI, Adhayani AN, Nurdiana, Fauzan, Bachok NA, Manggabarani AM, dan Utami YD. 2021. Teknologi Budidaya Tanaman Jagung (Zea mays) dan Sorgum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench). Makassar: Penerbit Jurusan Biologi FMIPA UNM.
Hagstrum DW, Klejdysz T, Subramanyam B, Nawrot J. 2013. Atlas of Stored-Product Insects and Mites. USA: AACC International, Inc. St. Paul. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-891127-75-5.50009-5.
Hasby. 2023. Kepekaan Beberapa Varietas Kacang Tanah (Arachis hypogaea L.) terhadap Araecerus fasciculatus DeGeer (Coleoptera: Anthribidae). Bachelor Thesis. Malang: Universitas Brawijaya.
Hill DS. 2002. Pests of Stored Foodstuffs and Their Control. London: Springer Science and Business Media.
Kumar A, Ray A. 2022. biological and infestation studies on Araecerus fasciculatus DeGeer a new pest of Melia azadirach L. in India. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science. 42:1245–1254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42690-021-00643-z.
Manueke J, Pelealu J. 2015. Ketertarikan hama Sitophilus oryzae pada beras, jagung pipilan, kacang tanah, kacang kedelai, dan kopra. Fakultas Pertanian Unsrat Manado. 21:70–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35791/eug.21.2.2015.9706.
Nadhifa DG, Mahendradatta M, Poespitasari A, Bastian F, Adhnitasari AY. 2025. Characterization of analog rice produced from various carbohydrate sources and their functional components: A review. Discover Food. 5:1–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44187-025-00473-9.
Ngom D, Fauconnier ML, Malumba P, Dia CAK, Thiaw C, Sembène M. 2020. Varietal susceptibility of maize to larger grain borer, Prostephanus truncatus (Horn) (Coleoptera; Bostrichidae), based on grain physicochemical parameters. Journal Plos One. 15:1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232164.
Novo JPS, Baptista EGC. 1998. Rresposta olfativa do caruncho-do café Araecerus fasciculatus (Deg.) (Coleoptera: Anthribidae) a feromônios. Annals of the Entomological Society of Brasil. 27:337–343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0301-80591998000300003.
Pratiwi NPE, Ananda KD. 2020. Pengaruh beberapa tingkatan suhu ruang terhadap waktu perkembangan Cryptolestes ferrugineus Stephens. BIOEDUKASI: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi. 13:74–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/bioedukasi-uns.v13i2.42391.
R Core Team. 2023. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Available at: http://www.R project.org/. [accessed 11 January 2025].
Rees D. 2004. Insects of Stored Products. Australia: CSIRO Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/9780643101128.
Salbiah, Hidayat Y, Sudrajat. 2022. Araecerus fasciculatus (De Geer) (Coleoptera: Anthribidae): Biologi dan kerusakannya pada singkong kering (Manihot esculenta Crantz). Jurnal Agrikultura. 33:225–235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/agrikultura.v33i2.40347.
Schoonhoven LM, Van Loon JJA, Dicke M. 2005. Insect-Plant Biology. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198525943.001.0001.
Schowalter TD. 2011. Insect Ecology An Ecosystem Approach Third Edition. UK: Academic Press.
Shah TR, Prasad K, Kumar P. 2016. Maize - a potential source of human nutrition and health: A review. Cogent Food & Agriculture. 2:1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2016.1166995.
Solomon D. 2002. Studies on Damage by Prostephanus truncatus (Horn) (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) and Araeceus fasciculatus (Deger) (Coleoptera: Anthribidae) to Dried Yam Chips. Bachelor Thesis. Ghana: University of Ghana.
Sulaiman AA, Kariyasa IK, Hoerudin, Subagyono K, Bahar FA. 2018. Cara Cepat Swasembada Jagung. Jakarta: IAARD Press.
Suleiman R, Rosentrater KA, Bern CJ. 2015. Evaluation of maize weevils Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky infestation on seven varieties of maize. Journal of Stored Products Research. 64:97–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2015.09.005.
Wahyuni T, Meilin A, Nasamsir. 2022. Pengaruh kadar air biji kopi liberika tungkal komposit (Coffea liberica L.) dalam penyimpanan terhadap serangan Araecerus fasciculatus (DeGeer). Jurnal Media Pertanian. 7:116–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33087/jagro.v7i2.156.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ammar Bielbark Khatami, Ludji Pantja Astuti, Akhmad Rizali

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

