<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd"><article xml:lang="en" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2089-0257</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Jurnal Entomologi Indonesia</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title>J Entomol Indones</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2089-0257</issn><issn pub-type="ppub">1829-7722</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Perhimpunan Entomologi Indonesia</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5994/jei.22.3.189</article-id><title-group><article-title>Host preference of <italic>Araecerus fasciculatus</italic> (DeGeer) (Coleoptera: Anthribidae): Adult presence and oviposition on twelve maize varieties</article-title><subtitle>Preferensi inang <italic>Araecerus fasciculatus </italic>(DeGeer) (Coleoptera: Anthribidae): Kehadiran imago dan oviposisi pada dua belas varietas jagung</subtitle></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Khatami</surname><given-names>Ammar Bielbark</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country><email>bielbark15@gmail.com</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor-0"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2337-203X</contrib-id><name><surname>Astuti</surname><given-names>Ludji Pantja</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-2"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6673-6198</contrib-id><name><surname>Rizali</surname><given-names>Akhmad</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-2"></xref></contrib></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Amalin</surname><given-names>Divina M.</given-names></name><address><country>Philippines</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="EDITOR-AFF-1"></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="AFF-1"><institution content-type="dept">Program Studi Entomologi Pertanian, Fakultas Pertanian</institution><institution-wrap><institution>Universitas Brawijaya</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/01wk3d929</institution-id></institution-wrap><addr-line>Jalan Veteran, Malang 65145</addr-line><country country="ID">Indonesia</country></aff><aff id="AFF-2"><institution content-type="dept">Departemen Hama dan Penyakit Tumbuhan, Fakultas Pertanian</institution><institution-wrap><institution>Universitas Brawijaya</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/01wk3d929</institution-id></institution-wrap><addr-line>Jalan Veteran, Malang 65145</addr-line><country country="ID">Indonesia</country></aff><aff id="EDITOR-AFF-1"><institution-wrap><institution>De La Salle University</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/04xftk194</institution-id></institution-wrap><addr-line>Taft Avenue, Manila</addr-line><country country="PH">Philippines</country></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor-0">Corresponding author: Ammar Bielbark Khatami, Program Studi Entomologi Pertanian, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Brawijaya, Jalan Veteran, Malang 65145, Indonesia.  Email: <email>bielbark15@gmail.com</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date iso-8601-date="2025-12-27" publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub"><day>27</day><month>12</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="collection" iso-8601-date="2025-11-30"><day>30</day><month>11</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>22</volume><issue>3</issue><issue-title>November</issue-title><fpage>189</fpage><lpage>196</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-6-2"><day>2</day><month>6</month><year>2025</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2025-12-16"><day>16</day><month>12</month><year>2025</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright (c) 2025 Ammar Bielbark Khatami, Ludji Pantja Astuti, Akhmad Rizali</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder>Ammar Bielbark Khatami, Ludji Pantja Astuti, Akhmad Rizali</copyright-holder><license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://jurnal.pei-pusat.org/index.php/jei/article/view/940" xlink:title="Host preference of Araecerus fasciculatus (DeGeer) (Coleoptera: Anthribidae): Adult presence and oviposition on twelve maize varieties">Host preference of Araecerus fasciculatus (DeGeer) (Coleoptera: Anthribidae): Adult presence and oviposition on twelve maize varieties</self-uri><abstract><p>The coffee bean weevil, <italic>Araecerus fasciculatus</italic> (DeGeer) (Coleoptera: Anthribidae), is a significant polyphagous stored product pest known to cause severe damage, including perforation and hollowing, in stored maize. This study aimed to determine the adult presence and oviposition preference of <italic>A. fasciculatus</italic> across twelve commercial maize varieties, and to analyze the correlation between preference and specific grain characteristics. The free choice test method (FCTM) was employed using preference cages with 12 or 6 chambers. In each test, 30 g of maize were infested with 60 pairs of 7- to 14-day-old <italic>A. fasciculatus</italic> adults for seven days. Adult presence (total and by sex) was recorded daily, and the number of eggs laid was counted microscopically at the end of the infestation period. The composition of maize varieties significantly affected adult presence and oviposition. Results consistently showed that the Pertiwi 3 variety was the most highly preferred for both adult presence (21.86 individuals in the 12-variety test) and oviposition (22.75 eggs in the 12-variety test). This high preference was supported by the Perkasa variety (e.g., 13.54 adults), which was also consistently preferred across the different test compositions. Further analysis using the generalized linear model (GLM) indicated that the preference is driven by grain quality: adult presence showed a positive correlation with moisture content, while oviposition exhibited a negative correlation with phenol content. These findings suggest that the Pertiwi 3 variety, likely due to its favorable physical attributes and low levels of chemical defense, is the most susceptible to <italic>A. fasciculatus</italic> infestation.</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>adult presence</kwd><kwd>maize</kwd><kwd>oviposition preference</kwd></kwd-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>File created by JATS Editor</meta-name><meta-value><ext-link xlink:title="JATS Editor" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://jatseditor.com">JATS Editor</ext-link></meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>issue-created-year</meta-name><meta-value>2025</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front><body><sec><title>INTRODUCTION</title><p>Maize (<italic>Zea mays L.</italic>) is globally one of the most vital cereal crops <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-25">(Shah et al., 2016)</xref>. In Indonesia, its utility is diverse, serving as a primary food source <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-27">(Sulaiman et al., 2018)</xref>, industrial raw material, cattle feed, and a component of the bioindustry <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-27">(Sulaiman et al., 2018)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-10">(Fiqriansyah et al., 2021)</xref>. In addition, maize is also high in carbohydrates and contains various nutrients, so it is considered a potential rice substitute <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-16">(Nadhifa et al., 2025)</xref>. The extensive utilization of this crop has spurred the development of numerous varieties, leading to significant increases in production yields. Indonesia’s production grew by 0.43 million tons between 2023 and 2024 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-6">(Statistik, 2024)</xref>, utilizing popular varieties such as Bisi 2, BTS 5, Bisma, Lamuru, Perkasa, Pertiwi 3, and others. As production volumes rise, effective post-harvest management is crucial to maintain the quality and quantity of stored maize.</p><p>A major threat to stored maize quality is infestation by the coffee bean weevil,<italic> Araecerus fasciculatus</italic> (DeGeer) <xref rid="BIBR-13" ref-type="bibr">(Hill, 2002)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-11">(Hagstrum et al., 2013)</xref>. This insect is highly polyphagous <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-14">(Kumar &amp; Ray, 2022)</xref> and cosmopolitan <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-1">(Alba-Alejandre et al., 2018)</xref>, distributed widely in tropical and subtropical regions. <italic>Araecerus fasciculatus</italic> is known to damage a broad array of stored commodities, including coffee, cassava, peanuts, dried and fresh fruits, and various medicinal materials. The damage inflicted by this pest is severe, resulting in perforations and hollowing of the diet <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-21">(Rees, 2004)</xref>. For instance, previous studies have documented yield reductions of up to 39.87% in coffee beans and 91.51% in dried cassava due to<italic> A. fasciculatus</italic> attack <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-26">(Solomon, 2002)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-29">(Wahyuni et al., 2022)</xref>.</p><p>The extent of damage caused by stored product pests is intrinsically linked to the inherent physical and chemical properties of the stored material. These properties vary among maize varieties and can profoundly influence insect behavior, particularly their host preference. Differences in grain characteristics affect insect activities such as adult aggregation, feeding, and oviposition site selection. However, limited information is currently available regarding the specific preferences of <italic>A. fasciculatus </italic>for various maize varieties concerning their physical and chemical profiles. Gaining this insight is critical for identifying vulnerable varieties and developing targeted management strategies. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the adult presence and oviposition preference of<italic> A. fasciculatus </italic>among twelve maize varieties using the free choice test method (FCTM), and to analyze the correlation between maize grain characteristics (specifically moisture and phenol content) and these preference indices.</p></sec><sec><title>MATERIALS AND METHODS </title><sec><title>Study sites and experimental design</title><p>This research was conducted from November 2024 to April 2025 at the Plant Pest Laboratory, Department of Plant Pests and Diseases, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Brawijaya (UB). The experimental design was used a completely randomized design (CRD) with twelve treatments (maize varieties) and four replication. The maize varieties tested were: Bisi 2, BTS 5, Bisma, Lamuru, Perkasa, Nusa 01, Nusa 03, Pertiwi 3, Sukmaraga, Bima 20 URI, Bima 14 Batara, and Srikandi Kuning.</p></sec><sec><title>Insect rearing and diet preparation</title><p><bold>Insect rearing. </bold>The coffee bean weevil,<italic> A. fasciculatus</italic>, specimens were obtained from the established insect collection at the Plant Pest Laboratory, UB. The insects were reared using a modified method based on <xref rid="BIBR-18" ref-type="bibr">(Novo &amp; Baptista, 1998)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-5">(Atikah et al., 2022)</xref>. Five hundred grams (500 g) of dried cassava were placed into a rearing box (16 cm × 16 cm × 10 cm). Two hundred (200) unsexed<italic> A. fasciculatus </italic>adults were introduced into the box for seven days for oviposition. After this period, the adults were removed, and the infested diet was maintained in the box until the F1 progeny emerged. The adult <italic>A. fasciculatus </italic>used for the preference test were aged 1–2 weeks old <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-18">(Novo &amp; Baptista, 1998)</xref>.</p><p><bold>Diet sterilization. </bold>All diets used in the study, dried cassava for rearing and the twelve maize varieties for the treatments, were heat-sterilized to prevent contamination <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-19">(Pratiwi &amp; Ananda, 2020)</xref>. The diets were placed in trays (29 cm × 21 cm × 4.5 cm) and heated in an oven at 40 °C for four hours. After sterilization, the diets were removed and allowed to cool at room temperature for at least 24 hours prior to use in the experiment.</p><p><bold>Maize grain analysis.</bold> To characterize the experimental diets, both physical and chemical analyses were conducted on twelve maize varieties. Physical characterization, specifically grain hardness, was measured at the Laboratory of Agricultural Food Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Universitas Gadjah Mada (UGM), Yogyakarta. Chemical profiling included the determination of total phenolic content and proximate composition. The phenolic analysis was performed at the Plant Pest Laboratory, Department of Plant Pests and Diseases, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, while proximate analysis was carried out at the Chemistry Laboratory, Balai Pengujian dan Sertifikasi Mutu Barang (BPSMB), Malang, to determine moisture, ash, crude protein, lipid, and carbohydrate contents.</p><p>The results demonstrate that these maize varieties possess distinct physical and chemical profiles (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-1">Table 1</xref>). Grain hardness varied substantially, ranging from 379.95 N to 866.10 N. Regarding chemical composition, phenol contents fluctuated between 6.09 ppm and 9.46 ppm, and protein levels ranged from 4.59% to 8.02%. Furthermore, carbohydrate levels remained consistently high across all varieties (73.94%–79.82%), indicating that the selected varieties differ markedly in both their structural integrity and specific nutrient concentrations.</p></sec><sec><title>Preference test using the free choice test method </title><p>The host preference of <italic>A. fasciculatus </italic>was evaluated using the free choice test method (FCTM) within custom-made, transparent glass preference cages (± 3 mm thick) equipped with internal glass partitions to create separate chambers. The study employed two types of cages: one with twelve chambers (<xref rid="figure-1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1</xref>A) and two separate units with six chambers each (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-1">Figure 1</xref>B). The experiments using the twelve-chamber and six-chamber configurations were conducted to verify the consistency of adult presence across different variety compositions. The twelve maize varieties were randomly assigned to these three test compositions: a single 12-variety test (all twelve varieties tested simultaneously), a first six-variety test (comprising Bisi 2, Bisma, Perkasa, Nusa 01, Sukmaraga, and Bima 20 URI), and a second six-variety test (comprising BTS 5, Lamuru, Nusa 03, Pertiwi 3, Bima 14 Batara, and Srikandi Kuning).</p><p>For each test, thirty grams (30 g) of the respective maize variety were placed into each chamber of the preference cage <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-9">(Chijindu &amp; Boateng, 2008)</xref>. Infestation was initiated by introducing sixty pairs (120 individuals) of 7- to 14-day-old <italic>A. fasciculatus </italic>adults into the center of the cage <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-8">(Chijindu, 2002)</xref>. The cages were then sealed with a modified lid and covered with cloth. The number of adults present in each variety chamber was recorded daily for a total of seven days. The final count at 7 days after infestation (DAI) was recorded both as the total number of individuals and as a percentage to analyze trends across the different test compositions. On the seventh day, the adults were removed, and a final count was conducted, distinguishing between males and females for sex ratio determination. Following adult removal, the maize seeds were immediately inspected under a microscope to determine the number of eggs laid in each maize variety, thereby assessing the oviposition preference.</p><table-wrap id="table-1" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 1</label><caption><p>Physical (hardness) and chemical (phenol and proximate) characteristics of twelve maize varieties</p></caption><table rules="all" frame="box"><thead><tr><th valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Maize varieties</th><th colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">Hardness (N)</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">Phenol (ppm)</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Protein (%)</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Lipid (%)</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">Moisture (%)</th><th valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">Ash (%)</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">Carbohydrate (%)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Bisi 2</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">551.06</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">9.46</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">6.72</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">4.47</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">13.53</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.34</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">73.94</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">BTS 5</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">560.55</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">7.89</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">6.48</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">4.45</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">8.27</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1.33</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">79.46</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Bisma</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">797.29</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">9.44</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">6.56</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">5.15</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">7.87</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.69</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">78.72</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Lamuru</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">586.20</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">9.46</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">6.59</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">4.13</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">7.94</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.53</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">79.82</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Perkasa</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">379.95</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">9.45</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">6.41</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">4.42</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">11.92</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.13</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">76.12</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Nusa 01</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">440.48</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">6.56</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">6.72</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">4.16</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">9.46</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1.59</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">78.06</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Nusa 03</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">866.10</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">8.76</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">5.90</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">4.38</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">10.17</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.45</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">78.10</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Pertiwi 3</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">670.72</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">6.09</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">4.59</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">4.03</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">12.59</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">1.22</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">77.57</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Sukmaraga</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">467.31</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">7.94</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">6.78</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3.84</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">8.88</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.41</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">79.09</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Bima 20 URI</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">640.73</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">8.77</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">5.87</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">4.25</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">8.99</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1.46</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">79.44</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Bima 14 Batara</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">400.33</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">8.82</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">7.88</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">3.40</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">10.43</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">1.40</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">76.90</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Srikandi Kuning</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">859.40</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">9.01</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">8.02</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">4.05</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">8.81</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.49</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">77.63</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="figure-1" ignoredToc=""><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p>Preference cage. A: 12 chambers and B: 6 chambers.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="png" mimetype="image" xlink:href="https://jurnal.pei-pusat.org/index.php/jei/article/download/940/639/8596"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig></sec></sec><sec><title>Data analysis</title><p>All data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) at a 5% significance level. If the ANOVA indicated a significant difference between treatments, further analysis was conducted using Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT) at a 5% error level. A generalized linear model (GLM) was employed to examine the relationship between the physical and chemical characteristics of the maize (e.g., moisture and phenol content) and the preference indices (adult presence and oviposition). All analyses were performed using R Statistics software, version 4.3.2 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-20">(Team, 2023)</xref>. The index of dispersion (ID) was used to determine the distribution pattern of the A. fasciculatus adults within the preference test chambers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-2">(Arbab &amp; Bakry, 2016)</xref>. The formula used for the ID calculation is:</p><p><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-1"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle ID = \frac{S^2}{\bar{x}} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula></p><p>where S<sup>2</sup> is the sample variance and x̄ is the mean of the population. The distribution patterns are categorized as: uniform (ID &lt; 1), random (ID = 1) and clumped (ID &gt; 1).</p></sec><sec><title>RESULTS</title><sec><title>Adult presence and preference of A. fasciculatus </title><p><bold>Total adult presence.</bold> The composition of maize varieties significantly influenced the total presence of<italic> A. fasciculatus</italic> adults across all preference tests conducted over the seven-day infestation period (12-variety test: F = 8.93, P &lt; 0.001; first six varieties: F = 33.88, P &lt; 0.001; second six varieties: F = 134.60, P &lt; 0.001). In the 12-variety preference test, the Pertiwi 3 variety (21.86 individuals) was the most preferred by <italic>A. fasciculatus</italic> adults, followed by Bisi 2 (14.22 individuals) and Perkasa (13.54 individuals) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-2">Table 2</xref>). When tested in combinations of six, the adults showed an even stronger preference for certain varieties. In the first six-variety test, adults preferred Perkasa (30.29 individuals) and Pertiwi 3 (49.79 individuals) significantly more than the other four varieties (<xref rid="table-3" ref-type="table">Table 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-4">Table 4</xref>). These combined results demonstrate that <italic>A. fasciculatus</italic> adults consistently favored Pertiwi 3 and Perkasa when presented with different combinations of maize varieties. The distribution pattern of the adults across the chambers was determined to be clumped in all three preference tests, as indicated by the index of dispersion (ID) values (12 varieties: ID = 2.47; first six varieties: ID = 2.12; second six varieties: ID = 9.62). Furthermore, a generalized linear model (GLM) analysis revealed a positive correlation between the moisture content of the maize and the total adult presence (Estimate = 1.475; P = 0.001) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-5">Table 5</xref>).</p><p><bold>Presence by sex and sex ratio.</bold> An analysis of variance confirmed that the maize variety composition significantly affected the presence of both males and females at 7 DAI across all tests. In the 12-variety test, both male and female <italic>A. fasciculatus</italic> preferred the Pertiwi 3 variety (males: 10.75 individuals; females: 10.50 individuals), followed by the Perkasa variety (males: 6.00 individuals; females: 7.25 individuals) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-2">Table 2</xref>). Similarly, in the first six-variety test, both sexes showed a higher preference for Perkasa (males: 14.50; females: 13.75 individuals) and Pertiwi 3 (males: 24.00; females: 25.50 individuals) over the other varieties (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-3">Table 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-4">Table 4</xref>). Regarding distribution, the index of dispersion showed a clumped distribution pattern for both males and females in the 12-variety and second six-variety tests. The only exception was the females in the first six-variety test, which showed a uniform distribution pattern (ID = 0.75). GLM analysis further revealed a positive correlation between moisture content and the presence of both males (Estimate = 0.577; P = 0.012) and females (Estimate = 0.507; P = 0.039) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-5">Table 5</xref>).</p><p>The sex ratio of <italic>A. fasciculatus </italic>adults varied across the preference tests. In the preference test of the twelve varieties of maize, the sex ratio of <italic>A. fasciculatus</italic> ranged from 1:0.60 to 1:1.36 (Table 2). The preference test on the first six varieties of maize showed that the sex ratio of <italic>A. fasciculatu</italic>s ranged from 1:0.95 to 1:1.31 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-3">Table 3</xref>). In the preference test of the second six varieties of maize, the sex ratio ranged from 1:0.63 to 1:1.06 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-4">Table 4</xref>).</p></sec><sec><title>Oviposition preference of <italic>A. fasciculatus</italic></title><p>The effect of maize variety composition on the number of eggs laid was significant in the 12-variety test (F = 7.98, P &lt; 0.001) but not significant in the first sixvariety test (F = 1.03, P &lt; 0.001). However, the effect was significant again in the second six-variety test (F = 15.06, P &lt; 0.001). Consistent with the adult presence results, the Pertiwi 3 variety received the highest number of eggs in both the 12-variety test (22.75 eggs) and the second six-variety test (45.00 eggs) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-2">Table 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-4">Table 4</xref>). These findings confirm that females consistently chose Pertiwi 3 as the preferred variety for egg-laying across the tests where significant differences were detected. The distribution of eggs was clumped in the first six-variety test (ID = 2.66) and the second six-variety test (ID = 17.37). However, the 12-variety test showed a uniform distribution pattern for oviposition. Finally, GLM analysis identified a negative correlation between the phenol content of the maize grain and the number of eggs laid (Estimate = -2.908; P = 0.048) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-5">Table 5</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table-2" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 2</label><caption><p> Adult presence of Araecerus fasciculatus during 7 days after infestation (DAI) and at 7 DAI on the 12 varieties of maize</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th colspan="1" rowspan="2" valign="middle" align="center">Maize varieties</th><th align="center" colspan="2" valign="middle">Adult presence during 7 DAI</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="2">Adult presence at 7 DAI</th><th align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="2" valign="middle">Sex ratio (M:F)</th><th rowspan="2" valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">Number of egg (Eggs) (x̄ ± SD)</th></tr><tr><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1"><p>Individuals </p><p>(x̄ ± SD)</p></th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle"><p>% </p><p>(x̄ ± SD)</p></th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">Male(Indiciduals) (x̄ ± SD)</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1"><p>Female(Individuals) </p><p>(x̄ ± SD)</p></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Bisi 2</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">14.22 ± 2.83 h</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">11.85 ± 2.36 b</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">6.75 ± 0.96 ab</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">6.00 ± 1.41 bc</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1:0.89</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">7.25 ± 2.06 b</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Bisma</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">9.00 ± 1.29 cd</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">7.50 ± 1.08 cd</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">4.25 ± 0.96 bcd</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">4.75 ± 1.50 bcd</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1:1.12</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">8.00 ± 4.83 b</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Perkasa</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">13.54 ± 4.54 bc</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">11.28 ± 3.78 bc</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">6.00 ± 1.83 abc</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">7.25 ± 3.50 ab</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">1:1.21</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">10.25 ± 4.57 b</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Nusa 01</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">8.11 ± 1.04 de</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">6.76 ± 0.87 de</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">4.00 ± 1.15 bcd</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">5.00 ± 1.41 bcd</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">1:1.25</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">6.00 ± 4.08 bc</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Sukmaraga</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">8.25 ± 2.06 de</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">6.88 ± 1.71 de</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">4.50 ± 0.58 bcd</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">4.50 ± 2.52 bcd</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1:1.00</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">5.00 ± 2.16 bc</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Bima 20 URI</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">7.64 ± 2.37 de</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">6.37 ± 1.97 de</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">2.75 ± 1.71 d</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">3.75 ± 1.26 cde</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1:1.36</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">5.25 ± 1.50 bc</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">BTS 5</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">7.22 ± 1.13 de</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">6.01 ± 0.94 de</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">4.50 ± 1.29 bcd</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">3.50 ± 0.58 cde</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1:0.78</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2.75 ± 1.26 cd</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Lamuru</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">7.61 ± 1.26 de</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">6.34 ± 1.05 de</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">4.00 ± 0.82 bcd</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">5.00 ± 0.82 bcd</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">1:1.25</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">7.25 ± 2.63 b</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Nusa 03</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">5.89 ± 1.74 e</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">4.91 ± 1.45 e</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">3.75 ± 2.22 cd</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">2.25 ± 0.96 e</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1:0.60</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.50 ± 0.58 d</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Pertiwi 3</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">21.86 ± 5.99 a</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">18.22 ± 4.99 a</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">10.75 ± 3.59 a</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">10.50 ± 2.52 a</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1:0.98</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">22.75 ± 11.00 a</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Bima 14 Batara</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">9.50 ± 2.53 cd</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">7.92 ± 2.11 cd</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">4.25 ± 1.71 bcd</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">4.50 ± 1.91 bcd</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1:1.06</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">5.50 ± 1.73 bc</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Srikandi Kuning</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">7.22 ± 1.08 de</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">6.02 ± 0.90 de</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">4.50 ± 1.29 bcd</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3.00 ± 1.41 de</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">1:0.67</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3.00 ± 3.37 d</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Numbers followed by the same letter in the same column are not significantly different at P &lt; 0.05. Individuals: total number of adults recorded per variety; %: proportion of adults per variety relative to the total population.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table-3" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 3</label><caption><p>Adult presence of <italic>Araecerus fasciculatus </italic>during 7 days after infestation (DAI) and at 7 DAI on the first 6 varieties of maize</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="2" valign="middle">Maize varieties</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="2">Adult presence during 7 DAI</th><th align="center" colspan="2" valign="middle">Adult presence at 7 DAI</th><th align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="2" valign="middle"><p>Sex ratio</p><p>(M:F)</p></th><th colspan="1" rowspan="2" valign="middle" align="center"><p>Number of egg (Eggs) </p><p>(x̄ ± SD)</p></th></tr><tr><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle"><p>Individuals </p><p>(x̄ ± SD)</p></th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1"><p>%</p><p>(x̄ ± SD)</p></th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1"><p>Male (Individuals)</p><p>(x̄ ± SD)</p></th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">Female (Individuals) (x̄ ± SD)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Bisi 2</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">22.61 ± 2.28 b</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">18.84 ± 1.90 b</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">10.50 ± 1.29 bc</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">11.00 ± 2.16 abc</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">1:1.05</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">14.75 ± 10.47 a</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Bisma</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">14.22 ± 3.13 c</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">11.84 ± 2.60 c</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">6.50 ± 1.73 d</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">8.50 ± 1.29 bc</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">1:1.31</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">12.25 ± 2.99 a</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Perkasa</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">30.29 ± 1.20 a</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">25.24 ± 1.00 a</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">14.50 ± 2.38 a</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">13.75 ± 2.36 a</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1:0.95</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">18.75 ± 7.46 a</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Nusa 01</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">15.07 ± 2.26 c</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">12.56 ± 1.88 c</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">7.75 ± 1.71 cd</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">9.75 ± 2.36 bc</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1:1.26</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">10.50 ± 5.20 a</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Sukmaraga</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">14.04 ± 2.53 c</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">11.70 ± 2.11 c</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">7.25 ± 1.71 d</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">7.75 ± 2.62 c</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1:1.07</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">12.75 ± 4.03 a</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Bima 20 URI</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">23.79 ± 1.81 b</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">19.82 ± 1.51 b</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">11.25 ± 2.50 b</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">11.50 ± 1.91 ab</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1:1.02</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">16.00 ± 3.56 a</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Numbers followed by the same letter in the same column are not significantly different at P &lt; 0.05. Individuals: total number of adults recorded per variety; %: proportion of adults per variety relative to the total population.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table-4" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 4</label><caption><p>Adult presence of <italic>Araecerus fasciculatus</italic> during 7 days after infestation (DAI) and at 7 DAI on the second 6 varieties of maize</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="2" valign="middle">Maize varieties</th><th colspan="4" valign="middle" align="center">Adult presence durng 7 DAI</th><th rowspan="2" valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">Sex (M:F)</th><th align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="2" valign="middle">Number of egg (Eggs) (x̄ ± SD)</th></tr><tr><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle"><p>Individuals </p><p>(x̄ ± SD)</p></th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1"><p>% </p><p>(x̄ ± SD)</p></th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">Male (Individuals) (x̄ ± SD)</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">Female (Individuals) (x̄ ± SD)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">BTS 5</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">13.29 ± 0.35 c</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">11.08 ± 0.29 c</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">7.25 ± 2.06 b</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">7.00 ± 0.82 b</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1:0.97</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">7.50 ± 2.08 bc</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Lamuru</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">16.29 ± 1.42 b</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">13.57 ± 1.19 b</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">8.25 ± 3.30 b</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">8.25 ± 1.26 b</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1:1.00</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">11.00 ± 3.74 b</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Nusa 03</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">11.96 ± 1.03 cd</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">9.97 ± 0.85 cd</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">6.75 ± 2.06 b</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">5.00 ± 0.82 cd</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1:0.74</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">4.00 ± 2.16 c</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Pertiwi 3</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">49.79 ± 2.37 a</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">41.49 ± 1.97 a</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">24.00 ± 1.83 a</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">25.50 ± 3.11 a</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1:1.06</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">45.00 ± 14.85 a</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Bima 14 Batara</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">17.43 ± 2.68 b</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">14.52 ± 2.24 b</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">10.25 ± 2.50 b</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">6.75 ± 2.06 bc</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">1:0.66</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">13.00 ± 7.16 b</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Srikandi Kuning</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">11.25 ± 1.07 d</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">9.38 ± 0.89 d</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">6.75 ± 1.26 b</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">4.25 ± 0.97 d</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1:0.63</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">5.00 ± 3.37 c</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Numbers followed by the same letter in the same column are not significantly different at P &lt; 0.05. Individuals: total number of adults recorded per variety; %: proportion of adults per variety relative to the total population.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table-5" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 5</label><caption><p>The results of the GLM analysis between the analysis of seed hardness, phenol, and proximate of various maize varieties with the research variables</p></caption><table rules="all" frame="box"><thead><tr><th align="center" colspan="1" rowspan="3" valign="middle">Variable</th><th colspan="3" rowspan="2" valign="middle" align="center">Adult presence during 7 DAI (Est)</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="6">Adult presence at 7 DAI</th><th rowspan="2" valign="middle" align="center" colspan="3">Number of eggs (Est)</th></tr><tr><th align="center" colspan="3" valign="middle">Male presence (Est)</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="3">Female presence (Est)</th></tr><tr><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">Est</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">SE</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">P</th><th colspan="1" valign="middle" align="center">Est</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">SE</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">P</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">Est</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">SE</th><th align="center" colspan="1" valign="middle">P</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">Est</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">SE</th><th valign="middle" align="center" colspan="1">P</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">(Intercept)</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">10.698</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">11.896</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.374</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">7.509</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">6.562</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.259</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">9.165</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">7.147</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.207</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">25.118</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">18.443</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.181</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Phenol</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">-0.821</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.638</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.205</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">-0.725</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.352</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.046*</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">-0.362</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.383</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.350</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">-0.887</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.989</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.375</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Hardness</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">-0.001</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.004</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.972</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.003</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.002</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.232</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">-0.003</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.002</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.166</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">-0.002</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.006</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.767</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Protein</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">-1.024</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.922</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.273</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">-0.045</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.509</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.929</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">-0.822</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.554</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.146</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">-2.908</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1.429</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.048*</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Lipid</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.748</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1.734</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.669</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.594</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.957</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.538</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.426</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.042</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.685</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">-0.532</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">2.689</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.844</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Ash</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">-3.327</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">5.551</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.552</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">-4.097</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">3.062</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.188</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">-0.439</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">3.335</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.896</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.892</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">8.606</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.918</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Moisture</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">1.475</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.397</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.001***</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="center">0.577</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.219</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.012*</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.507</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.238</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.039*</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">1.060</td><td valign="top" align="center" colspan="1">0.615</td><td align="center" colspan="1" valign="top">0.093</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>DAI: day after infestation; Est: estimate; SE: standard error; P: P-Value <italic>P &lt; 0.05; </italic>*P &lt; 0.01; ***P &lt; 0,001.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></sec></sec><sec><title>DISCUSSIONS</title><p>The preference of an insect for a specific host is fundamentally indicated by its consistent feeding and oviposition activities <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-23">(Schoonhoven et al., 2005)</xref>. In this study, the implementation of 12-variety and two 6-variety preference tests served to assess the consistency of host selection by <italic>A. fasciculatus</italic> adults across varying choices. The results strongly demonstrated that<italic> A. fasciculatus</italic> consistently preferred the Pertiwi 3 variety, and to a lesser extent, Perkasa, regardless of the other varieties present in the preference cage. This consistent choice suggests that the preference behavior of A. fasciculatus is driven by specific, inherent characteristics of the preferred maize varieties, which can be categorized into physical and chemical dietary factors <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-15">(Manueke &amp; Pelealu, 2015)</xref>. The consistently clumped distribution pattern observed for adults in most tests further affirms that the insects actively aggregated toward the preferred varieties rather than dispersing randomly.</p><p>The physical characteristics of the maize grain appear to play a critical role in facilitating infestation and oviposition. Pertiwi 3 is hypothesized to possess a kernel type with a softer endosperm, which increases its susceptibility to post-harvest pests compared to other varieties <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-28">(Suleiman et al., 2015)</xref>. Softer kernels mechanically ease the process of feeding and, critically, allow females to penetrate the seed coat with their ovipositors for egg deposition. This mechanism is consistent with reports showing that<italic> A. fasciculatus</italic> females more readily lay eggs in softer substrates, such as the dried cassava tips <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-22">(Salbiah &amp; Sudrajat, 2022)</xref>, mindi fruit pulp <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-14">(Kumar &amp; Ray, 2022)</xref>, and softer parts of the coffee bean <xref rid="BIBR-1" ref-type="bibr">(Alba-Alejandre et al., 2018)</xref>. Conversely, maize varieties with higher kernel hardness can act as a mechanical resistance, significantly reducing both feeding and colonization activities <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-17">(Ngom et al., 2020)</xref>.</p><p>Beyond physical attributes, the chemical characteristics of the maize varieties significantly influenced the adult presence and reproductive behavior of <italic>A. fasciculatus.</italic> Our generalized linear model (GLM) analysis established a positive correlation between the moisture content of the maize and the number of adults present. This aligns with prior findings that elevated moisture levels enhance the suitability of the diet, potentially increasing feeding activity, survivorship, and overall pest population growth in infested diets <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-4">(Astuti, 2019)</xref>. Studies have specifically highlighted that<italic> A. fasciculatus</italic> tends to prefer hosts with higher moisture content, such as peanuts <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-12">(Hasby, 2023)</xref>.</p><p>Furthermore, the oviposition preference was distinctly modulated by the host’s defensive chemistry. The GLM analysis revealed a negative correlation between the phenol content and the number of eggs laid. Phenol compounds function as a natural plant defense mechanism against phytophagous insects <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-24">(Schowalter, 2011)</xref>. The females of <italic>A. fasciculatus </italic>preferentially chose to lay eggs in varieties with lower phenol levels, such as Pertiwi 3 (which possesses low phenol and protein content, see<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-5">Table 5</xref>), thereby minimizing chemical toxicity exposure for their developing offspring. This behavior is a crucial adaptive strategy, ensuring that progeny develop successfully on an ideal diet <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-3">(Arotolu et al., 2018)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-12">(Hasby, 2023)</xref>. Although the sex ratio of the adults varied across tests, the consistent findings regarding both adult aggregation and egg-laying on the Pertiwi 3 variety ultimately confirm that its combination of favorable physical properties (soft kernel) and low levels of chemical defenses (low phenol) makes it highly susceptible to <italic>A. fasciculatus </italic>infestation.</p></sec><sec><title>CONCLUSIONS</title><p>The free choice test method (FCTM) successfully determined the host preference of A. fasciculatus among the twelve maize varieties tested. The results consistently demonstrated that the Pertiwi 3 variety was the most preferred by <italic>A. fasciculatus</italic> adults for both presence (infestation) and oviposition across the various test compositions. This strong preference is highly correlated with specific maize grain characteristics. Generalized linear model (GLM) analysis revealed that the adult presence of <italic>A. fasciculatus </italic>had a positive correlation with moisture content of the maize, while oviposition showed a negative correlation with phenol content. Consequently, the high preference for the Pertiwi 3 variety is attributable to its combination of favorable physical traits (hypothesized soft kernel) and low levels of chemical defenses (low phenol content), making it highly susceptible to infestation by<italic> A. fasciculatus.</italic></p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>REFERENCES</title><ref id="BIBR-1"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Micro-CT to document the coffee bean weevil, Araecerus fasciculatus (Coleoptera: Anthribidae), inside field-collected coffee cerries (Coffea canephora</article-title><source>Insects</source><volume>9</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Alba-Alejandre</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Alba-Tercedor</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Vega</surname><given-names>F.E.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2018</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>9</lpage><page-range>1-9</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/insects9030100</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-2"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Spatial distribution and minimum sample size for monitoring of parlatoria date scale insect, Parlatoria blanchardi (Targioni-Tozzetti) (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) on date palm trees</article-title><source>Agriculture Research &amp; Technology: Open Access Journal</source><volume>2</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Arbab</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bakry</surname><given-names>M.M.S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2016</year><fpage>79</fpage><lpage>90</lpage><page-range>79-90</page-range></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-3"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Influence of intrinsic factors of cowpea seed varieties on the cowpea weevil, Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae</article-title><source>Journal of Crop Protection</source><volume>7</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Arotolu</surname><given-names>T.E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Adeyemi</surname><given-names>J.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Adedire</surname><given-names>C.O.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2018</year><fpage>219</fpage><lpage>229</lpage><page-range>219-229</page-range></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-4"><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>Strategi Pengelolaan Hama Pascapanen</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Astuti</surname><given-names>L.P.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><publisher-name>UB Press</publisher-name><publisher-loc>Malang</publisher-loc></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-5"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>potensi minyak atsiri daun jeruk purut sebagai fumigan nabati terhadap Araecerus fasciculatus (De Geer) (Coleoptera: Anthribidae) pada biji kakao di tempat penyimpanan</article-title><source>Jurnal Entomologi Indonesia</source><volume>19</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Atikah</surname><given-names>P.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Harahap</surname><given-names>I.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sartiami</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><fpage>77</fpage><lpage>83</lpage><page-range>77-83</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5994/jei.19.1.77</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-6"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Luas panen, produksi, dan produktivitas jagung menurut provinsi 2023-2024</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Statistik</surname><given-names>B.P.S.] Badan Pusat</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><comment>Available at:</comment><ext-link xlink:href="https://www.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/2/MjIwNCMy/luas-panen--produksi--dan-produktivitas-jagung-menurut-provinsi.html" ext-link-type="uri">Available from: https://www.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/2/MjIwNCMy/luas-panen--produksi--dan-produktivitas-jagung-menurut-provinsi.html</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-7"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Factors affecting egg-laying behavior and fecundity of Callosobruchus chinensis (L.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) infesting stored pulses</article-title><source>Oriental Insects</source><volume>35</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bhattacharya</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Banerjee</surname><given-names>T.C.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2001</year><fpage>373</fpage><lpage>386</lpage><page-range>373-386</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00305316.2001.10417313</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-8"><element-citation publication-type="thesis"><article-title>Effect of Variety and Processed Forms of Cassava Chips on the Development of Prostephanus truncatus (Horn</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chijindu</surname><given-names>E.N.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2002</year><publisher-name>Nnamdi Azikiwe University</publisher-name><publisher-loc>Nigeria</publisher-loc><comment>Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) and Araecerus fasciculatus (DeGeer) (Coleoptera: Anthribidae). Magister Thesis.</comment></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-9"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Preference of and damage to processed cassava chips by Araecerus fasciculatus (Degeer</article-title><source>Journal of Applied Sciences Research</source><volume>4</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chijindu</surname><given-names>E.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Boateng</surname><given-names>B.A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2008</year><fpage>939</fpage><lpage>944</lpage><page-range>939-944</page-range></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-10"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fiqriansyah</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Putri</surname><given-names>S.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Syam</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rahmadani</surname><given-names>A.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Frianie</surname><given-names>T.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Anugrah</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sari</surname><given-names>Y.I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Adhayani</surname><given-names>A.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nurdiana</surname><given-names>Fauzan</given-names></name><name><surname>Bachok</surname><given-names>N.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Manggabarani</surname><given-names>A.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Utami</surname><given-names>Y.D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><comment>Teknologi Budidaya Tanaman Jagung (Zea mays) dan Sorgum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench). Makassar: Penerbit Jurusan Biologi FMIPA UNM</comment></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-11"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Atlas of Stored-Product Insects and Mites</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hagstrum</surname><given-names>D.W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Klejdysz</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Subramanyam</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nawrot</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2013</year><publisher-name>AACC International, Inc. St</publisher-name><publisher-loc>USA</publisher-loc><comment>DOI:</comment><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/B978-1-891127-75-5.50009-5</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-12"><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>Kepekaan Beberapa Varietas Kacang Tanah (Arachis hypogaea L.) terhadap Araecerus fasciculatus DeGeer (Coleoptera: Anthribidae). Bachelor Thesis</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="given-only"><given-names>Hasby</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><publisher-name>Universitas Brawijaya</publisher-name><publisher-loc>Malang</publisher-loc></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-13"><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>Pests of Stored Foodstuffs and Their Control</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hill</surname><given-names>D.S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2002</year><publisher-name>Springer Science and Business Media</publisher-name><publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-14"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>biological and infestation studies on Araecerus fasciculatus DeGeer a new pest of Melia azadirach L. in India</article-title><source>International Journal of Tropical Insect Science</source><volume>42</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kumar</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ray</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><fpage>1245</fpage><lpage>1254</lpage><page-range>1245-1254</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s42690-021-00643-z</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-15"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Ketertarikan hama Sitophilus oryzae pada beras, jagung pipilan, kacang tanah, kacang kedelai, dan kopra</article-title><source>Fakultas Pertanian Unsrat Manado</source><volume>21</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Manueke</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pelealu</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2015</year><fpage>70</fpage><lpage>79</lpage><page-range>70-79</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.35791/eug.21.2.2015.9706</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-16"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Characterization of analog rice produced from various carbohydrate sources and their functional components: A review</article-title><source>Discover Food</source><volume>5</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nadhifa</surname><given-names>D.G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mahendradatta</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Poespitasari</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bastian</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Adhnitasari</surname><given-names>A.Y.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>30</lpage><page-range>1-30</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s44187-025-00473-9</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-17"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Varietal susceptibility of maize to larger grain borer, Prostephanus truncatus (Horn</article-title><source>Journal Plos One</source><volume>15</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ngom</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fauconnier</surname><given-names>M.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Malumba</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dia</surname><given-names>C.A.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Thiaw</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sembène</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>16</lpage><page-range>1-16</page-range><comment>Coleoptera; Bostrichidae), based on grain physicochemical parameters.</comment><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0232164</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-18"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Rresposta olfativa do caruncho-do café Araecerus fasciculatus (Deg.) (Coleoptera: Anthribidae) a feromônios</article-title><source>Annals of the Entomological Society of Brasil</source><volume>27</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Novo</surname><given-names>J.P.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Baptista</surname><given-names>E.G.C.</given-names></name></person-group><year>1998</year><fpage>337</fpage><lpage>343</lpage><page-range>337-343</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/S0301-80591998000300003</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-19"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Pengaruh beberapa tingkatan suhu ruang terhadap waktu perkembangan Cryptolestes ferrugineus Stephens</article-title><source>BIOEDUKASI: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi</source><volume>13</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pratiwi</surname><given-names>N.P.E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ananda</surname><given-names>K.D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><fpage>74</fpage><lpage>78</lpage><page-range>74-78</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.20961/bioedukasi-uns.v13i2.42391</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-20"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>R: a language and environment for statistical computing</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Team</surname><given-names>R.Core</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><comment>Available at:</comment><ext-link xlink:href="http://www.Rproject.org/." ext-link-type="uri">Available from: http://www.Rproject.org/.</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-21"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Insects of Stored Products</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rees</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2004</year><publisher-name>CSIRO Publishing</publisher-name><publisher-loc>Australia</publisher-loc><comment>DOI:</comment><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1071/9780643101128</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-22"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Araecerus fasciculatus (De Geer) (Coleoptera: Anthribidae): Biologi dan kerusakannya pada singkong kering (Manihot esculenta Crantz</article-title><source>Jurnal Agrikultura</source><volume>33</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Salbiah</surname><given-names>Hidayat Y.</given-names></name><name name-style="given-only"><given-names>Sudrajat</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><fpage>225</fpage><lpage>235</lpage><page-range>225-235</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24198/agrikultura.v33i2.40347</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-23"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Insect-Plant Biology</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schoonhoven</surname><given-names>L.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Loon</surname><given-names>J.J.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dicke</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2005</year><publisher-name>Oxford University Press</publisher-name><publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc><comment>DOI:</comment><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/oso/9780198525943.001.0001</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-24"><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>Insect Ecology An Ecosystem Approach Third Edition</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schowalter</surname><given-names>T.D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2011</year><publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name><publisher-loc>UK</publisher-loc></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-25"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Maize - a potential source of human nutrition and health: A review</article-title><source>Cogent Food &amp; Agriculture</source><volume>2</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shah</surname><given-names>T.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Prasad</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kumar</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2016</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>9</lpage><page-range>1-9</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/23311932.2016.1166995</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-26"><element-citation publication-type="thesis"><article-title>Studies on Damage by Prostephanus truncatus (Horn</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Solomon</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2002</year><publisher-name>University of Ghana</publisher-name><publisher-loc>Ghana</publisher-loc><comment>Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) and Araeceus fasciculatus (Deger) (Coleoptera: Anthribidae) to Dried Yam Chips. Bachelor Thesis.</comment></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-27"><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>Cara Cepat Swasembada Jagung</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sulaiman</surname><given-names>A.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kariyasa</surname><given-names>I.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hoerudin</surname><given-names>Subagyono</given-names></name><name><surname>K</surname><given-names>Bahar</given-names></name><name name-style="given-only"><given-names>F.A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2018</year><publisher-name>IAARD Press</publisher-name><publisher-loc>Jakarta</publisher-loc></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-28"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Evaluation of maize weevils Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky infestation on seven varieties of maize</article-title><source>Journal of Stored Products Research</source><volume>64</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Suleiman</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rosentrater</surname><given-names>K.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bern</surname><given-names>C.J.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2015</year><fpage>97</fpage><lpage>102</lpage><page-range>97-102</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jspr.2015.09.005</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-29"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Pengaruh kadar air biji kopi liberika tungkal komposit (Coffea liberica L.) dalam penyimpanan terhadap serangan Araecerus fasciculatus (DeGeer</article-title><source>Jurnal Media Pertanian</source><volume>7</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wahyuni</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Meilin</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name name-style="given-only"><given-names>Nasamsir</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><fpage>116</fpage><lpage>122</lpage><page-range>116-122</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.33087/jagro.v7i2.156</pub-id></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>